SecBot SecBot

PREVAIL Act

S. 1553 Sen. Christopher Coons (D-DE) In committee
  1. Introduced May 1
  2. Committee May 1
  3. Passed Senate Next
  4. Passed House Not yet
  5. To President Not yet
  6. Law Not yet
Where it stands
In committee, May 1, 2025Next: Senate vote
545d ago May 1, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Final votes
No roll callsNo recorded vote on this bill yet
Lobbying
12companies, 67 filings
Member trades
56trades in the last 90 days
Who backs the bill and who pushes back Subscribe

Companies lobbying on this bill

12 companies
Companies by sector
Technology & Software 5Biotech & Pharma 2Medical Devices & Healthcare 2Consumer & Retail 1Financials 1Industrials 1
Search all 12 companies, their asks and price moves Subscribe

Summary

Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership Act or the PREVAIL Act

Full summary8 paragraphs

This bill addresses various issues relating to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), including by imposing additional requirements on administrative patent validity challenges (proceedings to review and potentially cancel issued patents) at the USPTO.

The bill modifies provisions relating to inter partes reviews (IPRs) and other administrative patent validity proceedings, including by

- prohibiting an administrative patent judge who participated in deciding whether to institute an IPR (i.e., whether to allow the IPR to proceed based on the initial petition) from also participating in deciding the final outcome of the same IPR;

- prohibiting a person (individual or entity) from petitioning for an IPR against a patent unless the person meets certain standing requirements (currently, any person may petition for an IPR);

- prohibiting a person who has challenged a patent's validity in an IPR from raising the same challenges against the patent in other proceedings (e.g., district court) if the IPR has been instituted; and

- raising the burden that the petitioner in an IPR must meet to invalidate a previously issued patent claim.

The bill also makes institutions of higher education (IHEs) and nonprofit entities that hold patents on behalf of IHEs eligible for reduced patent-related fees, including filing fees. (Currently, employees of IHEs are eligible for reduced fees but not the IHEs themselves.)

The bill also makes fees collected by the USPTO available for the USPTO's use without further appropriations from Congress.

Library of Congress summary, May 1, 2025

Summary versions
  • Introduced in SenateMay 1, 2025

Official record from Congress.gov, the House Clerk and the Senate; lobbying from Lobbying Disclosure Act filings. Updated Oct 27, 2026.