SecBot SecBot

DISCOURSE Act

S. 921 Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) In committee
  1. Introduced Mar 22
  2. Committee Mar 22
  3. Passed Senate Next
  4. Passed House Not yet
  5. To President Not yet
  6. Law Not yet
Where it stands
In committee, Mar 22, 2023Next: Senate vote
1316d ago Mar 22, 2023: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Final votes
No roll callsNo recorded vote on this bill yet
Lobbying
1company, 1 filing
Member trades
0trades in the last 90 days
None in these companies
Who backs the bill and who pushes back Subscribe

Companies lobbying on this bill

1 company
Companies by sector
Communications & Media 1
Search all 1 companies, their asks and price moves Subscribe

Summary

Disincentivizing Internet Service Censorship of Online Users and Restrictions on Speech and Expression Act or the DISCOURSE Act

Full summary8 paragraphs

This bill limits federal liability protections for a user or provider of an interactive computer service (e.g., a social media company) related to content provided by third parties. It also requires a provider that offers its service through a mass-market offering to the public to disclose information about its content moderation activities.

The bill removes liability protections (sometimes referred to as section 230 protection) for a provider with a dominant market share if the provider

- promotes or suppresses a viewpoint through its content moderation, including by affecting a content creator's revenue;

- uses automated processes (e.g., algorithms) to target and amplify content provided to a user who has not requested or searched for the content; or

- solicits, funds, modifies, or otherwise contributes to content.

Currently, a provider retains liability protections even when it restricts access to materials that it considers objectionable. Under this bill, a provider retains protections if restricted materials fall, based on an objectively reasonable belief, into a prescribed list of harmful or unlawful categories.

Additionally, the liability protections shall not apply to providers that (1) restrict access to content in a manner that burdens the exercise of religion, or (2) fail to comply with an existing requirement to notify customers of options for limiting a minor's access to harmful online content (e.g., parental controls).

The bill also changes legal procedures related to the liability protections, including by specifying that the protection serves as an affirmative defense.

Library of Congress summary, Mar 22, 2023

Summary versions
  • Introduced in SenateMar 22, 2023

Official record from Congress.gov, the House Clerk and the Senate; lobbying from Lobbying Disclosure Act filings. Updated Oct 27, 2026.